The Evaluation Gap in Astronomy—Explained through a Rational Choice Framework

The concept of evaluation gaps captures potential discrepancies between what researchers value about their research, in particular research quality, and metrics measure. existence can give rise to questions the relationship intrinsic extrinsic motivations perform i.e., how field-specific notions quality compete with captured via metrics, consequently manage balancing act values requirements procedures. This study analyses gap from a rational choice point view for case observational astronomers, based on literature review 19 semi-structured interviews international astronomers. On basis institutional norms capital at play academic astronomy, I shed light workings its consequences astronomy. find that astronomers experience an anomie: they want follow motivation pursue science order push knowledge forward, while same time following comply norms. is art serving performance indicators stay academia, compromising as little possible. Gaming strategies shall appearance compliance, institutionalised means achieve good bibliometric record are used innovative ways, such salami slicing or going easy publications. leads overall decrease quality.